Talking about debatable topics: Open ended questions to learn without offending!
Whether you are in a classroom or perhaps in a party, an interesting conversation might end all of a sudden, with hurt or upset people and no one wiser for the exchange. Even if you might be sincerely interested to know and study alternate opinions, you should first acquire the skill of asking open ended questions. You can frequently find these on Bibles like Bibles for Children.
Well meaning individuals can spoil everyone's probabilities of being familiar with a topic of social debate, because they are lacking the competence. Effective and also careful use of unsupported claims, in addition to an open ended question technique, can open the door to a exciting and also thorough debate where everyone benefits.
For example, let's imagine you're at a party, anxious to get to know new as well as interesting persons. Controversial topics are usually, on some level, delicate in nature. You have relatives in the breakaway state of Russia therefore have different points of views of the reality of the current Russian presence. You begin a discussion with a history professor with the this remark. "I think it's just awful how the Russians sent troops into Georgia, harming civilian people! What do you think?"
If you don't know the opinion or sentiments of that professor, you might have put your foot in your mouth. You have initiated the conversation by stating your opinion up-front. What happens if that professor is a Russian immigrant, with strong reactions on the Russian position? You've effectively divested yourself of understanding several valuable historical facts that might shed some light on the situation. Once this educated person gets offended, the conversation could be brief and uninformative.
Yet, given the similar scenario, posing an open ended question does not encourage disagreement or bias on your part. You might ask, "You are a history professor and I am curious to understand more about the case in the Georgian conflict. What's behind this?"
This alternative approach does not state your perspective, except one of ignorance. While the professor may have a bias, she or he will not perceive you as an opponent and will be flattered because you appreciate what they already know. It's unimportant whether this person agrees with you. The goal is to learn what they think and also know, how they reached their findings and grow more informed at the same time.
An additional example of the open ended topic, used in a purely social context might concern a debatable film. "Have you watched Michael Moore's 'Sicko'? I believe that guy's a freak and disgracefully unpatriotic, don't you?" You've claimed your position, placing the person you're asking in a likely awkward lurch. Few people of the opposite perspective will probably be impolite enough to tell you off. A second loss to your account!
How about, "Have you seen 'Sicko'? I'm interested regarding his opinion on the health care situation. It's getting lots of press." These kinds of examples on the utilization of open ended questions may be a bit heavy handed, but deliberately so. You will see the need for learning, devoid of offending.
Well meaning individuals can spoil everyone's probabilities of being familiar with a topic of social debate, because they are lacking the competence. Effective and also careful use of unsupported claims, in addition to an open ended question technique, can open the door to a exciting and also thorough debate where everyone benefits.
For example, let's imagine you're at a party, anxious to get to know new as well as interesting persons. Controversial topics are usually, on some level, delicate in nature. You have relatives in the breakaway state of Russia therefore have different points of views of the reality of the current Russian presence. You begin a discussion with a history professor with the this remark. "I think it's just awful how the Russians sent troops into Georgia, harming civilian people! What do you think?"
If you don't know the opinion or sentiments of that professor, you might have put your foot in your mouth. You have initiated the conversation by stating your opinion up-front. What happens if that professor is a Russian immigrant, with strong reactions on the Russian position? You've effectively divested yourself of understanding several valuable historical facts that might shed some light on the situation. Once this educated person gets offended, the conversation could be brief and uninformative.
Yet, given the similar scenario, posing an open ended question does not encourage disagreement or bias on your part. You might ask, "You are a history professor and I am curious to understand more about the case in the Georgian conflict. What's behind this?"
This alternative approach does not state your perspective, except one of ignorance. While the professor may have a bias, she or he will not perceive you as an opponent and will be flattered because you appreciate what they already know. It's unimportant whether this person agrees with you. The goal is to learn what they think and also know, how they reached their findings and grow more informed at the same time.
An additional example of the open ended topic, used in a purely social context might concern a debatable film. "Have you watched Michael Moore's 'Sicko'? I believe that guy's a freak and disgracefully unpatriotic, don't you?" You've claimed your position, placing the person you're asking in a likely awkward lurch. Few people of the opposite perspective will probably be impolite enough to tell you off. A second loss to your account!
How about, "Have you seen 'Sicko'? I'm interested regarding his opinion on the health care situation. It's getting lots of press." These kinds of examples on the utilization of open ended questions may be a bit heavy handed, but deliberately so. You will see the need for learning, devoid of offending.
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét